Philosophy and Economics

Patricia Marino
University of Waterloo Department of Philosophy, 2019
Niveau: débutant
Perspective: Autre
Sujet: Réflexion sur l'économie
Format: Description du cours/syllabus

This syllabus was originally taught at the University of Waterloo Winter Semester 2019.
Instructor: Patricia Marino

Course Description

The philosophy of economics is concerned with conceptual, methodological, foundational and ethical issues in economic theory and practice. In this course, we'll consider questions such as:

  • What can philosophy of science teach us about economic methodology?
  • What makes a particular conclusion in economics justified or true?
  • How do economic models work?
  • Is economics a science?
  • What are implications of modeling people as self-interested utility maximizers of utility?
  • Does economic methodology reflect gendered presuppositions?
  • What is at stake in the debate over classical versus behavioral economics?
  • How do value-based considerations play a role in economic reasoning and policy?
  • What are the ethical implications of using efficiency-based reasoning?
  • What are alternatives to efficiency-based reasoning?
  • How do conceptual matters impact applications, e. g. in environmental economics?

This course does not endorse any particular conclusion about these matters; rather, the idea is for you to both understand what others have had to say, and to develop, possibly change, and learn how to intelligently defend, your own opinions.

Course Objectives

This course should help you be able to:

  • analyze and critically evaluate divergent views over conceptual issues in economics;
  • understand some ways that values play a role in economic thought and policy making;
  • develop your own ideas concerning economic justification and objectivity;
  • develop your own opinions about contentious practical economic issues in society;
  • effectively communicate your ideas orally and in written work.

Course Outline

Week 1: Introduction, Smith's "invisible hand," and the historical roots of efficiency

  • Adam Smith, An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, Book 1, Chapter 2 ("Of the Principle which Gives Occasion to the Division of Labor," and Book 4 Chapter 2 ("Of Restraints Upon Importation from Foreign Countries of Such Goods as Can Be Produced at Home") (see posted pdf, or text available online).
  • William Grampp, "What Did Smith Mean by the Invisible Hand?" Journal of Political Economy, 108(3) (2000), 441-465, read only Introduction to end of Section 2 (pages 441-446).
  • David Hume, Enquiry Concerning Principles of Morals, Section 1, Section 2, and Section 3 part 1(text available online).

Week 2: Introduction to economic and economic methodology; Mill on a priori reasoning in economics

  • Daniel Hausman, Introduction to The Philosophy of Economics 3rd ed. (Cambridge University Press, 2008), pp. 22-25 ("An Introduction to Economics" and "An Introduction to Economic Methodology).
  • J. S. Mill, John Stuart Mill, "On the Definition of Political Economy and the Method of Investigation Proper to It" (read only from "What is now commonly understood by the term 'Political Economy' is not..." to the end of the essay). This is Essay V of Essays on Some Unsettled Questions of Political Economy, text online and as a kindle download).

Week 3: Methodology and justification 1: Friedman and his critics

  • Milton Friedman, "The Methodology of Positive Economics," in Essays in Positive Economics, University of Chicago Press 1953, 3-43. Text available online. • Bruce Caldwell, "Critique of Friedman's Methodological Instrumentalism," Southern Economic Journal (1980), 366-374.

Week 4: Methodology and justification 2: economic models and methods

  • Robert Sugden, "Credible Worlds: The Status of Theoretical Models in Economics." Journal of Economic Methodology 7.1 (2000): 1-31. 4

Week 5: Methodology and justification 3: is economics a science? 

  • Alfred Eichner, "Why Economics Is Not Yet a Science," Journal of Economic Issues (1983): 507-520.
  • Raj Chetty, "Yes Economics is a Science." • Eric Schliesser, "Economics as a Science."
  • Alex Rosenberg, "If Economics Is a Science, what Kind of a Science Is It?" The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Economics, 2009.

Week 7: Feminist economics and perspectives on rational choice theory 

  • Paula England, "A Feminist Critique of Rational-Choice Theories: Implications for Sociology," The American Sociologist, 20(1) (1989), 14-28.
  • Ann Cudd, "Rational Choice Theory and the Lessons of Feminism" in Antony, Witt, and Atherton eds., A Mind of One’s Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity (Westview Press, 2001), 398-417.

Week 8: Behavioral economics and its critics 

  • Christine Jolls, Richard Thaler, and Cass Sunstein, "A Behavioral Approach to Law and Economics," Stanford Law Review 1998, 1471-1550.
  • Richard Posner, "Rational Choice, Behavioral Economics, and the Law" Stanford Law Review (1998): 1551-1575.

Week 9: Ethics, values, and economics 1: the limits of self-interest and challenges to consequentialism 

  • Amartya Sen, "Rational Fools: A Critique of the Behavioral Foundations of Economic Theory," Philosophy and Public Affairs, 6(4) (1977), 317-344.
  • John Harsanyi, "Morality and the Theory of Rational Behavior." Social research (1977): 623-656.
  • E. F. Carritt, "Criticisms of Utilitarianism," from Bratman and Perry eds., Introduction to Philosophy, 477-479.

Week 10: Ethics, values, and economics 2: Pareto efficiency, alternatives to consequentialism, and the challenge of inequality

  • Mark White, (2009). "Pareto, Consent, and Respect for Dignity: a Kantian Perspective." Review of Social Economy 67 (2009), 49-70.
  • John Rawls, selection from A Theory of Justice (first published 1971), reprinted in Russ Shafer-Landau, Ethical Theory (Wiley, 2013) 581-591.
  • T. M. Scanlon, "Libertarianism and Liberty," Boston Review, October 16, 2011.

Week 11: Ethics, values, and economics 3: Cost-benefit analysis and its critics

  • Mark Sagoff, "At the Shrine of Our Lady of Fatima, or Why Political Questions Are Not All Economic," Arizona Law Review Vol. 23 (1981), pp. 1283-1298 Mar 15: Robert Frank, "Why is Cost-Benefit Analysis So Controversial?" The Journal of Legal Studies, 29(S2) (2000), 913-930. Choy, Yee Keong. "Cost-benefit Analysis, Values, Wellbeing and Ethics: An Indigenous Worldview Analysis." Ecological Economics 145, no. C (2018): 1-9.

Download Syllabus here

Tags: methodology | philosophy | philosophy of economics | philosophy of science
Teil 2: Adam Smith und der Wohlstand der NationenWoher kommt der Kapitalismus? Ist er eine natürliche Folge der gesellschaftlichen Entwicklung ? Oder resulti... 2014 Level: débutant Der Kapitalismus – Adam Smith und der Wohlstand der Nationen (2/6) Bruno Nahon & Ilan Ziv YouTube (ARTE) Jason Smith takes a stab at blind faith in the efficiency of the price mechanism to provide market information. To do so, he calls upon Information Theory and Generative Adversarial Networks to argue the price mechanism is faulty and skewed towards supply. 2017 Level: débutant Hayek Meets Information Theory. And Fails Jason Smith Evonomics Das Dezernat Zukunft hatte in diesem Webinar Stefan Eich als Gesprächsgast eingeladen, um über dessen druckfrisch-erschienenes Buch: “The Currency of Politics: The Political Theory of Money from Aristotle to Keynes” (Princeton University Press, 2022), damit sowohl über die historische Rolle von Geldsystemen als politische Institutionen, als auch über die zukünftigen … 2022 Level: avancé The Currency of Politics - Open House Webinar mit Stefan Eich Stefan Eich Dezernat Zukunft Wie selbstverständlich geht die heutige ökonomische Standardlehre davon aus, dass sie Studierenden eine feste und unveränderliche Sicht auf die Welt vermitteln kann. Doch woher kommt diese Annahme? Walter Lippmann, einer der Begründer des Neoliberalismus, gibt hierauf einen ersten Hinweis: Wirtschaftswissenschaft soll in der Lage sein, Bilder in Köpfen von Menschen zu verankern, die allem Denken und Handeln unbewusst zugrunde liegen, selbst aber nicht schöpferisch veränderbar sind. Anhand dreier Stationen – ausgesuchten Textpassagen von Adam Smith, John Stuart Mill und Léon Walras – zeigt der Beitrag, wie die Wirtschaftswissenschaft hierfür das Denken umformen musste: hin zu einem rein erfahrungsunabhängigen Denken, das seine Inspiration nicht aus der Begegnung mit der Wirklichkeit, sondern allein aus der reinen Mathematik und Mechanik übernimmt. Zugleich zeigt die philosophische Auseinandersetzung mit der Geschichte dieser Wissenschaft, dass diese Umformung selbst weder zwangsläufig noch alternativlos ist. Auch in der Ökonomie lässt sich die schöpferische Kraft des Denkens zurückgewinnen. 2016 Level: avancé „Gefangene der Bilder in unseren Köpfen“ - Die Macht abstrakten ökonomischen Denkens Silja Graupe Institute für Ökonomie und Philosophie Cusanus Hochschule This paper posts a heretical question: Is economics a science after all? The answer to this question impinges on the methodology, hypotheses and results of economic research. Level: avancé Is economics a science? Andri W. Stahel Real-world economics review Wo fängt ein Subjekt an – und wo hört es auf? Diese Frage ist zentral für die Art und Weise, wie wir über Wirtschaft nachdenken und sie organisieren. Ein Beitrag von Manuel Schulz. 2023 Level: avancé Auf dem Weg zu einer existenziellen Ökonomik Manuel Schulz Economists for Future This Blog Post describes the U.S. federal reserve money system from the perspective of the Modern Monetary Theory (MMT). Therefore it presents a theory of money creation, gives simple examples how this influences the economy and the historical process of why the monetary system of the US has developed this way. 2019 Level: débutant An Introduction in the Federal Reserve Money system J.D. ALT NewEconomicsPerspectives.org

Nous soutenir

Ce projet est le fruit du travail des membres du réseau international pour le pluralisme en économie, dans la sphère germanophone (Netzwerk Plurale Ökonomik e.V.) et dans la sphère francophone (Rethinking Economics Switzerland / Rethinking Economics Belgium / PEPS-Économie France). Nous sommes fortement attachés à notre indépendance et à notre diversité et vos dons permettent de le rester ! 

Donner