Karl Polanyi pour penser le capitalisme aujourd'hui

Karl Polanyi pour penser le capitalisme aujourd'hui
Corine Vercher-Chaptal, Corinne Vercher-Chaptal
Xerfi Canal, 2021
Poziom: początkujący
Nurt ekonomii: Ekonomia instytucjonalna
Temat: Kapitalizm, philosophy of economics
Formularz: Explainer Video
Czas trwania: 00:06:37
Link: https://www.xerficanal.com/iqsog/emission/Corinne-Vercher-Chaptal-Karl-Polanyi-pour-penser-le-capitalisme-d-aujourd-hui-_3749551.html

"Xerfi Canal a reçu Corinne Vercher-Chaptal, professeur en Sciences de Gestion à l'Université Sorbonne Paris Nord, pour parler du moment Polanyi. Une interview menée par Jean-Philippe Denis." Lors de cet interview, Corinne Vercher-Chaptal mobilise la théorie de Karl Polanyi pour analyser l'évolution du capitalisme des plateformes.

Commentaire de nos éditeurs:

Dans cette vidéo, Corine Vercher-Chaptal nous expose les thèses issues d'un article qu'elle a coécrit pour penser le réencastrement des plateformes et du capitalisme des plateformes. Dans cet article, Corinne Vercher-Chaptal et ses co-auteurs étudient les plateformes alternatives resituées dans le contexte du capitalisme de plateforme : l'évolution du capitalisme via l'économie numérique engendre de nouvelles formes d'entreprises qui captent, extraient des données qu'ils valorisent monétairement. Ce système fait écho au régime féodal (voir Cédric Durand, Techno-féodalisme. Critique de l’économie numérique. Zones, 2020 sur le néo-féodalisme en lien avec le capitalisme de plateforme. Le cadre polanyien forgé pour analyser le capitalisme industriel et son évolution depuis le 19ème est pertinent pour saisir les évolutions du capitalisme aujourd’hui et le contre mouvement qu'il provoque. Elle explique les concepts polanyiens de désencastrement/réencastrement et celui de marchandisation / marchandise fictive. Selon elle et ses co-auteurs, le capitalisme de plateforme accentue et étend le domaine de la "marchandisation".

Cliquer ici: Karl Polanyi pour penser le capitalisme aujourd'hui

Ce matériau a été suggéré et édité par:

Constance André--Aigret
Tags: history of economic thought | Plateforme | Polanyi
In this paper the main developments in post-Keynesian macroeconomics since the mid- 1990s will be reviewed. For this purpose the main differences between heterodox economics in general, including post-Keynesian economics, and orthodox economics will be reiterated and an overview over the strands of post-Keynesian economics, their commonalities and developments since the 1930s will be outlined. This will provide the grounds for touching upon three important areas of development and progress of post-Keynesian macroeconomics since the mid-1990s: first, the integration of distribution issues and distributional conflict into short- and long-run macroeconomics, both in theoretical and in empirical/applied works; second, the integrated analysis of money, finance and macroeconomics and its application to changing institutional and historical circumstances, like the process of financialisation; and third, the development of full-blown macroeconomic models, providing alternatives to the mainstream 'New Consensus Model' (NCM), and allowing to derive a full macroeconomic policy mix as a more convincing alternative to the one implied and proposed by the mainstream NCM, which has desperately failed in the face of the recent crises.
2012
Level: zaawansowane
Post-Keynesian macroeconomics since the mid-1990s: Main developments
Eckhart Hein
Institute for International Political Economy Berlin
If there’s one method economists have neglected the most, it’s qualitative research. Whereas economists favour mathematical models and statistics, qualitative research seeks to understand the world through intensive investigation of particular circumstances, which usually entails interviewing people directly about their experiences. While this may sound simple to quantitative types the style, purpose, context, and interpretation of an interview can vary widely. Because of this variety, I have written a longer post than usual on this topic rather than doing it a disservice. Having said that, examples of qualitative research in economics are sadly scant enough that it doesn’t warrant multiple posts. In this post I will introduce qualitative research in general with nods to several applications including the study of firm behaviour, race, Austrian economics, and health economics. More than usual I will utilise block quotes, which I feel is in the spirit of the topic.
2020
Level: początkujący
Qualitative Methods in Economics: "You Can Observe a Lot Just by Watching"
Cahal Moran
Rethinking Economics
In this podcast, Laura Basu speaks with a range of expert academics and public speakers – such as Jayati Ghosh, Yanis Varoufakis, Walden Bello, and Ashish Kothari about how the rules of the global economy are fostering the inequality and underdevelopment we see today.
2020
Level: początkujący
Decolonising the Global Economy
Laura Basu, Jayati Ghosh, Yanis Varoufakis, Walden Bello and Ashish Kothar
openDemocracy
Sabel and Zeitlin present the persistence of small firms in Europe, against the rise of mass production and modern enterprises. Their article starts by analysing how mass production can be considered a historical necessity for the classical view, as it is a highly specialized structure, where man and machine can …
1985
Level: zaawansowane
Historical Alternatives to Mass Production: Politics, Markets and Technology in Nineteenth-Century Industrialization
Charles Sabel and Jonathan Zeitlin
Oxford University Press on behalf of The Past and Present Society
This course will expose students to some of the key debates that link digital transformations to economic, social, and political inequalities. Students will be familiarised with a variety of theoretical movements in development studies and internet studies: exploring thinking that frames the internet as a leveller that can bridge divides vs. exploring the internet as an infrastructure that amplifies existing inequalities.
2022
Level: ekspert
Digital Capitalism and its Inequalities
Prof. Mark Graham
https://www.oii.ox.ac.uk/study/courses/digital-capitalism-and-its-inequalities-2/
Jason Smith takes a stab at blind faith in the efficiency of the price mechanism to provide market information. To do so, he calls upon Information Theory and Generative Adversarial Networks to argue the price mechanism is faulty and skewed towards supply.
2017
Level: początkujący
Hayek Meets Information Theory. And Fails
Jason Smith
Evonomics

Wesprzyj

Ten projekt został stworzony przez Sieć na rzecz Pluralistycznej Ekonomii (Netzwerk Plurale Ökonomik e.V.).  Jest on zaangażowany w różnorodność i niezależność i jest zależny od darowizn od ludzi takich jak Ty. Regularne lub jednorazowe datki będą bardzo mile widziane.

 

Wesprzyj