Sustainable Finance – Hoax or necessity. A global perspective

Anne Löscher
Summer Academy 2022 for Pluralist Economics, 2022
Niveau: débutant
Perspective: Autre
Sujet: Ressources, environment & climat
Format: Description du cours/syllabus

This workshop was originally taught at the Summer Academy for Pluralist Economics 2022
Instructor: Anne Löscher (University of Siegen, Germany)

Background and aim of the workshop

The world is on fire – as Greta Thunberg put it. Though we have “only” reached an average global rise in temperature of 1.2°C compared to preindustrial levels, we already experience dramatic changes: extreme weather events have quadrupled since the 1980ies. If we continue on the current emission path we might cause the earth to warm up by 4°C on average until the end of this century (IPCC, 2019). The resulting storms, droughts, floods, desertification, extreme temperature shifts etc. have fundamental macroeconomic consequences: food inflation is projected to rise, imperilling food security; the destruction of infrastructure, production sites and household wealth as a result of the physical effects of the climate crisis impact balance sheets of countries, firms, households and financial institutions with destabilising effects for the financial system and the economy as a whole; and transitional risks coming with policy decisions to shift towards a low-carbon economy such as the EU’s plan to become carbon-neutral till 2050 yield the risk of stranded assets with further destabilising effects (Batten, Sowerbutts and Tanaka, 2020; Bolton et al., 2020).

These developments also affect financial markets, its agents and regulatory bodies. The volume of financial assets classified as environmentally or socially sustainable has jumped from around US$400billion in 2012 to about US$1.300billion in the second quarter of 2020 (Belloni et al., 2020) – a rise by 325%. The Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) was founded in 2015 as result of a G20 summit’s decision to include financial risks in financial regulation frameworks. Institutions like the Network for Greening the Financial System (NGFS) – a conglomerate of different central banks and supervisory bodies – followed in 2017. The worlds’ biggest financial investors such as BlackRock (BlackRock, 2021) and JPMorgan (JPMorgan Chase&Co., 2021) are jumping on the train by promising enormous portfolio restructurings. 

Aim of this intensive workshop is 1.) to introduce the participants to the macroeconomic workings of the climate crisis as the background of sustainable finance; 2.) to introduce financial assets with ESG (Environmental, Social and Governance) criteria attached to them and their markets and important institutional players; 3.) to provide a critical perspective on the current setup of sustainable finance; 4.) and to work on in-depth case studies illustrating the workings on ESG-finance markets, its emitters and traders as well as their macroeconomic implications.

Previous knowledge on financial markets is not required. ECTS-points can be collected in this workshop. The workshop will be conducted in English, however, brief explanations can be given in German, too, if needed.

 

Selected literature:

Here is some introductory material (not necessarily endorsement!):

Readings:

Videos:


Preliminary outline

  • Day 1: Macroeconomics in times of the Climate Crisis
  • Day 2: Workings of ESG-instruments, financial markets and its big players
  • Day 3: Greening the financial system: policies and regulations;  pros and cons of sustainable finance and of its possible alternatives
  • Day 4: In-depth case study analyses
  • Day 5: Buffer day and wrapping up
  • Day 6: Presentation of group work, feedback round 

 

Download syllabus here

Tags: climate | climate change | climate related risks | finance | macroeconomic | macroeconomics | sustainable
This video explains what the term 'Feminist Economics' describes and goes into detail on how feminist economists use methodology differently, why they advocate for diversity in research and how to look into preconditions for the functioning of our economies. It, additionally, highlights the link between feminist economics and the study of climate change.
2020
Level: débutant
What is Feminist Economics & what does it have to do with studying the climate crisis?
Henrika Meyer
Rethinking Economics
Dani Rodrik, Professor of International Political Economy at Harvard's Kennedy School of Government, is teaching in this online session about the global rules under which the modern (free trade-focused) type of globalization operates and why, under such institutions, international community fails to deal with the climate change and pandemics.
2020
Level: débutant
Pandemics, Climate Change, and Global Economics: Where Did We Go Wrong in Globalization?
Dani Rodrik
Harvard Kennedy School
The last 15 years have seen extensive research into ecosystem service valuation (ESV), spurred by the Millenium Ecosystem Assessment in 2005 (Baveye, Baveye & Gowdy, 2016). Ecosystem services are defined as “the benefits people obtain from ecosystems” (Millenium Ecosystem Assessment, p.V). For example, ecosystems provide the service of sequestering carbon which helps regulate the climate. Valuation means giving ecosystems or their services a monetary price, for example researchers have estimated that the carbon sequestration services of the Mediterranean Sea is between 100 and 1500 million euros per year. The idea of ESV was a response to the overuse of natural resources and degradation of ecosystems, allegedly due to their undervaluation and exclusion from the monetary economy. ESV can be used (1) for policy decision-making, for example allocating funding to a reforestation project (2) for setting payments to people who increase ecosystem services, for example a farmer increasing the organic carbon content of their soil, and (3) for determining fees for people who degrade ecosystem services, for example a company that causes deforestation.
2021
Level: débutant
A Pluralist Perspective on Ecosystem Service Valuation Introduction
Maya
Exploring Economics
Brauchen wir angesichts der sich zuspitzenden Klimaproblematik neue ökonomische Denkweisen – jenseits der ‚unsichtbaren Hand des Marktes’ und des ‚rationalen’ Agenten – und wie sollten diese aussehen?
2020
Level: débutant
Neues ökonomisches Denken für eine klimaverträgliche Handelsordnung und Wirtschaft
Thomas Köller
Economists for Future
Ce podcast présente l’incompatibilité entre notre modèle économique et l’exigence écologique. « Comment affronter sérieusement les désordres de la planète si l’on s’évertue à réanimer un modèle économique qui en est la cause » ? s’est exclamé Gaël Giraud (chef économiste de l’Agence Française de Développement). La question de l'équation entre les impératifs économiques de court terme (croissance, emploi) et les exigences planétaires de long terme (l'avenir de notre monde) semble toujours irrésolue.
2018
Level: débutant
Economie/écologie : l'impossible conjugaison?
Gaël Giraud
France Culture
In kaum einem anderen Bereich stehen kurzfristige, private Interessen so stark im Konflikt mit langfristigen, gesellschaftlichen Interessen wie in der Autoindustrie. Wie könnte diese Diskrepanz langfristig verringert werden?
2021
Level: débutant
Die Autoindustrie demokratisieren?
Vincent Janz, Lukas Warning und Max Wilken
Economist for Future

Nous soutenir

Ce projet est le fruit du travail des membres du réseau international pour le pluralisme en économie, dans la sphère germanophone (Netzwerk Plurale Ökonomik e.V.) et dans la sphère francophone (Rethinking Economics Switzerland / Rethinking Economics Belgium / PEPS-Économie France). Nous sommes fortement attachés à notre indépendance et à notre diversité et vos dons permettent de le rester ! 

Donner