Economic History

Robert Skidelsky
INET, 2019
Niveau: débutant
Perspective: Économie institutionnelle
Sujet: Institutions, gouvernements & politiques, Réflexion sur l'économie
Format: Lecture / Presentation
Durée: 00:23:49
Lien: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GFgrJa5X56g

In this tenth lecture in INET’s “How and How Not to Do Economics,” Robert Skidelsky argues that there are two main reasons why economists should study history. The first is to make history better. The second is to make economics better. If history is the study of the particular, and economics of the general, the value of history to economics is to enable them to make their generalizations more concrete and admit their limits.

Go to: Economic History

Tags: economic history | historical analysis | history | history of economic thought | institutional economics | philosophy of science
Economists claim they are not biased or ideological, but research by economist Mohsen Javdani tells another story. Javdani discovered that 82% of economists claim that statements and arguments should be evaluated on the content only, but the results of the study show the exact opposite.
2020
Level: débutant
The Dangerous Ideological Bias of Economists
Mohsen Javdani
INET - Institute for New Economic Thinking
An analysis of the modern neoliberal world, its characteristics, flaws and planetary boundaries aiming to end new economic politics and support a global redistribution of power, wealth and roles. In this online lecture, economist and Professor at the School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS), London, UK. Costas Lapavitsas, explains the limitations of the neoliberal market in creating financial stability and growth in both, developing and developed countries.
2020
Level: avancé
The Limits to Neoliberalism: how states respond to the crisis
SOAS Open Economics Forum, SOAS Economics Department, Costas Lapavitsas
SOAS University of London
Lecture on the paper "The Economic Limits of Bitcoin and Anonymous, Decentralized Trust on the Blockchain"
2022
Level: débutant
The Economics of Cryptocurrencies
Eric Budish
Economics Department, Oxford University
Bastard-Keynesianismus in einer „doktrinenbezogenen Darstellung des Stoffes“ Eckhard Hein Quelle: van Treeck, Till, and Janina Urban. Wirtschaft neu denken: Blinde Flecken in der Lehrbuchökonomie. iRights Media, 2016. Das Buch kann hier bestellt werden: http://irights-media.de/publikationen/wirtschaft-neu-denken/.   Rezensiertes Buch: Felderer, B./Homburg, S. (2005): Makroökonomik und neue Makroökonomik, 9. Auflage. Berlin: Springer, 496 Seiten. Im …
2016
Level: débutant
Bastard-Keynesianismus in einer „doktrinenbezogenen Darstellung des Stoffes“
Eckhard Hein
Wirtschaft neu denken: Blinde Flecken in der Lehrbuchökonomie

Nous soutenir

Ce projet est le fruit du travail des membres du réseau international pour le pluralisme en économie, dans la sphère germanophone (Netzwerk Plurale Ökonomik e.V.) et dans la sphère francophone (Rethinking Economics Switzerland / Rethinking Economics Belgium / PEPS-Économie France). Nous sommes fortement attachés à notre indépendance et à notre diversité et vos dons permettent de le rester ! 

Donner