✕
REDEFINAMOS
LA ECONOMIA
REDEFINAMOS
LA ECONOMIA
… y recibirás contenido personalizado
según tus intereses en tu bandeja de entrada

Philosophy of Economics

Dan Hausman
University of Wisconsin-Madison, 2015
Grado: debutante
Perspective: Otros
Topic: Reflexión sobre economía
Format: Programa de estudios

This syllabus was originally taught at the University  of Wisconsin-Madison Winter Semester 2015.
Instructor: Dan Hausman

Introduction:

This is an unusual class, in which I hope to exploit you while at the same time providing a valuable learning experience for you. The reading for the course will consist largely of the rough draft of the third edition of Economic Analysis, Moral Philosophy, and Public Policy (EAMPPP), which is co-authored by Michael McPherson, Debra Satz, and me. EAMPPP aims to provide a general introduction to (a) the influence of ethical considerations on positive economics, (b) the tools and concepts of normative (welfare) economics, (c) the most important ethical theories and concepts that are relevant to the concerns of economists, (d) the ethical limits of capitalist markets, (e) analytical tools forged by economists that may be of use to moral philosophers, and (f) the distinctions between positive and normative economics and the relations between them.

There may also be supplementary readings. There will be some lectures -- how many will depend on how successful you and I are at generating fruitful discussion. I shall distribute reading or study questions before each class and ask you, with the help of those questions to study a chapter or section of EAMPPP and then come to class with tentative answers to the study questions and especially objections, criticisms, questions, and suggestions for improvement. Class discussion will be structured around your comments and questions. I will, of course, have a good deal (indeed probably too much) to say.

Whether this turns out to be a great class or a mediocre one thus depends crucially on your input. If you get excited about the issues and are full of questions and challenges, you can make this into an excellent course. Of course, I’ll bear lots of the responsibility, too, in guiding your reading with study questions and in making my contributions to discussion clearly and briefly and then shutting up.

Course Goals:

The overall goal is to give you a grasp of the terrain at the boundaries between economics and ethics where policies are born and die. The guide to the exploration of this territory is the third edition of Economic Analysis, Moral Philosophy, and Public Policy.

More specifically the course aims to accomplish a long list of goals:

  1. To give students an appreciation of the ethical and political commitments that are often implicit in purportedly value-neutral “positive” economic theorizing.
  2. To provide an introduction to standard welfare economics, including the notion of social welfare functions and cost-benefit analysis.
  3. To provide an introduction to those concepts and theories in ethics and political philosophy that are most relevant to normative economics. These concepts include welfare, efficiency, freedom, rights, equality, solidarity, benevolence, capabilities, and justice, and the most important theories are utilitarianism, libertarianism, egalitarianism, and Rawls’ theory of justice.
  4. To provide an understanding of the character and moral implications of market relations among individuals and of the appropriate limits to market relations. In other words, what should and shouldn’t be for sale?
  5. To provide an introductory grasp of tools economists have developed that are of potential value for ethical reflection and political theorizing. These include rational choice theory, social choice theory, and game theory.
  6. To provide a grasp of the relationship between positive economics (which purports to explain and describe in an ethically neutral way) and normative economics and policy, which depend on values.
  7. In addition, a more general goal is to provide an introduction to the nature of argument and of informal logic in general: To the extent that this course helps you to make and criticize arguments, it should be valuable for you, quite apart from its particular subject matter.
  8. Lastly, the course aims to help you to develop your abilities to present and to criticize arguments both in discussion and, in particular, in writing: Every good essay, regardless of the subject matter, is an extended argument for some thesis or conclusion. The only thing special about philosophy essays is the extent to which one focuses upon the logic of the argument. This course should help you to write more sharply organized, focused and effective essays. It is hard to separate bad writing and sloppy thinking.

The extent to which these course goals can be achieved is largely up to you, but it is important that you appreciate what I am trying to accomplish. If you cannot see how any particular discussion or reading assignment relates to the goals of the course, ask about it. In abstract matters it is especially important and especially difficult to be clear on what the point is. Keep asking "So what?"

Since this course is more concerned with mastering skills than with acquiring information, it demands your active participation, and I think that the interest and importance of the issues we will be addressing will reward that participation.

What this course does not aim to do:

  1. This course does not aim to cover the material that one would expect to find in an introductory economics course. Although there will be significant economic content, it will be limited to matters that are relevant to the goals listed above.
  2. This course does not aim to cover the material that one would expect to find in either an introductory ethics course or in an introduction to political theory. There will be a great deal of philosophical content, but it will be limited to content relevant to the course goals.
  3. This course does not aim to provide simple answers to current problems of economic policy. I hope that the clarifications this course provides will help you to make up your mind on policy questions, but the course does not aim to answer them. What is important in the course is intellectual honesty and the sort of perseverance that makes one struggle to bring one's convictions and the weight of argument into accord. The course should help you rationally to make up your own mind concerning whether there should be a higher minimum wage, higher (or lower) taxes on the wealthy, reliance on markets or government to provide health care or to protect the environment, and so forth.

 

Press here for a detailed description

Tags: philosophy | philosophy of economics | philosophy of science
L'auteur interroge la compatibilité entre le système capitaliste avec les limites et frontières écologiques. 2017 Level: debutante Le capitalisme est-il compatible avec les limites écologiques ? Antonin Pottier Institut Veblen Pour les réformes économiques This film looks at the role economic growth has had in bringing about this crisis, and explores alternatives to it, offering a vision of hope for the future and a better life for all within planetary boundaries. 2020 Level: debutante Fairytales of Growth Pierre Smith Khanna Fairy Tales of Growth Geldökonomien vermitteln nicht einfach Wirtschaftssubjekte; sie führen zu einer charakteristischen Trennung zwischen Arbeitenden und Konsumenten. Während die klassische Ökonomie die Arbeit in den Mittelpunkt rückte, sollen nach neoklassischer Lehre die Konsumenten durch ihre Präferenzen die gesamte Ökonomie über die Preise steuern. Diese Denkfigur wird nachfolgend in ihrer ideologischen Funktion dechiffriert. Die Reduktion der meisten Menschen auf die Rolle passiver Konsumenten, die andererseits beim Gelderwerb dem Diktat des Eigentums als Arbeitskraft subsumiert sind, prägt sowohl die Struktur der modernen kapitalistischen Gesellschaften wie die Psyche der Menschen. Die Dualität von Tätig-Sein und Güter-Haben entpuppt sich als spezifische Herrschaftsform. 2014 Level: adelantado Vom Tätig-Sein und Güter-Haben Karl-Heinz Brodbeck Institute für Ökonomie und Philosophie Cusanus Hochschule In this video, Rajan Raghuram highlights ‘A hereditary Meritocracy’. He identifies the “limitations” with the current economic systems of democracy and markets. 2019 Level: debutante A Hereditary Meritocracy Raghuram Rajan New Economic Thinking This paper attempts to clarify how the European economic crisis from 2007 onwards can be understood from the perspective of a Marxian monetary theory of value that emphasizes intrinsic, structural flaws regarding capitalist reproduction. Chapter two provides an empirical description of the European economic crisis, which to some extent already reflects the structural theoretical framework presented in chapter three. Regarding the theoretical framework Michael Heinrich's interpretation of 'the' Marxian monetary theory of value will be presented. Heinrich identifies connections between production and realization, between profit and interest rate as well as between industrial and fictitious capital, which represent contradictory tendencies for which capitalism does not have simple balancing processes. In the context of a discussion of 'structural logical aspects' of Marx's Critique of the Political Economy, explanatory deficits of Heinrich's approach are analyzed. In the following, it is argued that Fred Moseley's view of these 'structural logical aspects' allows empirical 'applications' of Marxian monetary theories of value. It is concluded that a Marxian monetary theory of value, with the characteristics of expansive capital accumulation and its limitations, facilitates a structural analysis of the European economic crisis from 2007 onwards. In this line of argument, expansive production patterns are expressed, among other things, in global restructuring processes, while consumption limitations are mitigated by expansive financial markets and shifts in ex-port destinations. 2019 Level: perito The European economic crisis from 2007 onwards in the context of a global crisis of over-production of capital - a Marxian monetary theory of value interpretation Sascha Gander Institute for International Political Economy Berlin Dans cette vidéo, Éric Monnet, lauréat du Prix du meilleur jeune économiste 2022, se penche sur le rôle des institutions financières durant les périodes de crises économiques. 2022 Level: debutante Éric Monnet (Meilleur jeune économiste 2022) : Le rôle des banques centrales dans l'économie Eric Monnet BFM Business Die Economists4Future wollten eine Diskussion über notwendige Konsequenzen der Klimakrise für die Wirtschaftswissenschaften anstoßen – was bisher aber kaum gelungen ist. Das liegt vor allem daran, dass der neoklassische Mainstream weiterhin Diskursverweigerung betreibt. Ein Beitrag von Franziska M. Hoffart und Michael Roos. 2020 Level: debutante Ist die Neoklassik bereit zum Diskurs? Franziska M. Hoffart und Michael Roos Economist for Future

Donar

Este proyecto es presentado por la Network for Pluralist Economics (Netzwerk Plurale Ökonomik e.V.) y socios internacionales.  Está comprometida con la diversidad y la independencia y depende de las donaciones de personas como tú. Donaciones regulares o puntuales serán muy apreciadas!

 

Donar