Too much Maths, too little History: The problem of Economics

Lord Robert Skidelsky, Dr. Ha-Joon Chang, Prof. Steve Pisckhe and Prof. Francesco Caselli
LSE Economic History Departement, 2015
Level: beginner
Perspective: Other
Topic: Reflection of Economics
Format: Panel Discussion
Duration: 01:37:10
Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6rXBBqMmIP8

This panel discusses the role of mathematics and history within economics. Lord Robert Skidelsky and Dr. Ha-Joon Chang advocate for a more prominent role of history and a less prominent role of mathematics within economics. Prof. Steve Pisckhe and Prof. Francesco Caselli defend the dominant role of mathematics within economics. Each of the speakers gives a 10-15 minutes talk advocating his position, before the panel is opened up for Q&A. The discussion is moderated by Prof. James Foreman-Peck.

Comment from our editors:

The role of mathematics within economics has been controversially discussed for the last 200 years and is essential to the understanding of economics as a discipline. In the 19th century the introduction of mathematics into economics was a long and widely debated process, before it got increasingly accepted over the course of the 20th century. This panel discussion provides a good starting point to reflect on the role of both mathematics and history within the discipline, as the different opinions get the same amount of time to present their perspective on the issue.

Go to: Too much Maths, too little History: The problem of Economics

This material has been suggested and edited by:

Nicolà Bezzola
Tags: history of economic thought | history of economics | mathematisation of economics | methodology | philosophy of science
Was passiert, wenn man Kahnemans Analyse der kognitiven Verzerrungen auf Lehrbücher anwendet? Silja Graupe macht's in ihrer aktuellen Forschung.
2017
Level: beginner
Vielfalt verantworten. Auswege aus der geistigen Monokultur der Ökonomie
Silja Graupe
oikos Köln
Institution largement méconnue du grand public, la Banque des Règlements Internationaux (BRI) n'en est pas moins un organe central de la réflexion économique. Dans cet essai, Henri Lepage confronte la thèse de la Stagnation Séculaire chère à Larry Summers - et aux économistes néo-keynésiens plus largement - aux travaux de …
2019
Level: advanced
BRI versus Summers
Henri Lepage
Inference
Eckhard Hein criticises the mainstream's view of secular stagnation as the result of a negative real equilibrium interest rate. Arguing in a Keynesian spirit with particular reference to Steindl, secular stagnation is considered to be a result of shift in the functional income distribution, and oligopolistic organisation of industries, leading to excess capacity and reluctance to invest. This acts as a drag on effective demand and results in secular stagnation. Distributional policies and public investment can, however, overcome stagnation its tendencies.
2015
Level: advanced
Secular Stagnation or stagnation policy? Steindl after Summers
Eckhard Hein
IMK
In parallel to rising inflation numbers, the concept of profit inflation has clearly risen to prominence in recent years. But what is it exactly? This dossier aims not only to collect the most important publications on profit inflation but also intends to map out the development of the discourse and the different positions within the debate.
2024
Level: advanced
Profit Inflation: Mapping the debate
Theresa Walter
Exploring Economics
In this short talk „On Economics“ Ha-Joon Chang, author of the book „Economics: The User's Guide“, gives a critical wrap-up on the economic discipline – on what is perceived as economics, what are dominant paradigms, the role of numbers and economics in public life. He further elaborates on the importance of heterodox schools of thought.
2014
Level: beginner
Ha-Joon Chang on Economics
Ha-Joon Chang
The RSA
Mit allerhöchster Wahrscheinlichkeit neoklassische Ansätze, denn diese dominieren das Studium der VWL heutzutage an den meisten Universitäten. Jedoch ist der Begriff 'Neoklassik' mittlerweile selbst zu einem Streitthema geworden. Verteidiger des Mainstreams verstehen Neoklassik zumeist eng und beziehen sich auf die ideengeschichtliche Entwicklung der allgemeinen Gleichgewichtstheorie (Jevons, Arrow und Debreu) sowie das Wachstumsmodell von Solow.
2018
Level: beginner
Stickeraktion: Studiere ich VWL oder Neoklassik?
 
Netzwerk Plurale Ökonomik e.V.

Donate

This project is brought to you by the Network for Pluralist Economics (Netzwerk Plurale Ökonomik e.V.).  It is committed to diversity and independence and is dependent on donations from people like you. Regular or one-off donations would be greatly appreciated.

 

Donate