The complimentary relationship between institutional and complexity economics

The complimentary relationship between institutional and complexity economics
Claudius Gräbner
Munich personal RePEc archive https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de, 2017
Level: leicht
Perspektive: Komplexitätsökonomik
Thema: Reflexion der Ökonomik
Format: Working Paper
Link: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/77091/

Today, a growing number of interdisciplinary scholars are pushing the research program of complexity economics. However, several decades earlier, evolutionary institutionalists such as Thorstein Veblen and Gunnar Myrdal (the pioneers of institutionalist economics) already stressed the complexity of social systems, just without using the buzzword “complexity.” Thus, the emergence of the research program of complexity economics should be good news for institutionalists. Yet, there are only a few overlaps between the two research communities. This is mostly due to the different personal and disciplinary backgrounds of the researchers, a lack of an explicit meta-theory on the side of complexity economics, and a very different set of methods.

This paper shows the complementary relationship between institutionalist and complexity economics by focusing on an epistemological concept called "mechanismic explanations".

Section 1 deals with the claim that many renowned institutionalists anticipated the complexity challenge and considered the economy as a complex system. Complexity and institutional economists both share this same basic ontology.

Section 2 explains what “mechanismic explanations” are. It is a particular concept, which invites closer collaboration between institutionalists and complexity economists. In order to make further progress in the understanding of complex economic systems, scientists must seek mechanism-based explanations.

Sections 3 examines a challenge arising in the context of mechanismic explanations, namely that a meta-theoretical mean is required in order to discriminate among competing mechanismic explanations for the same observed phenomenon. Complexity economists can benefit from the deep type of explanation that comes from the philosophical framework of systemism, underlying institutionalist theory.

Section 4 examines another challenge arising in the context of mechanismic explanations, namely that forming opinions or suppositions about mechanisms that operate in the real world (without having complete information about them) and studying them empirically requires particular methods. Institutionalist economists can benefit from the toolbox of complexity economists to overcome this challenge.

Section 5 closes this essay with some remarks on the concept of a “mechanism”.

Comment from our editors:

This paper is a good recommendation for students who have already read the "Compare"and the "Explore" section on the Exploring Economics website regarding Complexity Economics, Institutionalist Economics, and Evolutionary Economics.

This paper gives a glimpse into the history of economic thought behind these three perspectives, the challenges faced by each, as well as a way for them to come to each other’s aid and co-build something that is more than the sum of each’s parts.

Go to: The complimentary relationship between institutional and complexity economics

This material has been suggested and edited by:

Dennis Venter
Tags: agent-based modelling (ABM) | complex adaptive system | complexity | complexity economics | evolutionary | Evolutionary Economics | history of economic thought | institutional economics | interdisciplinary | methodology
First some properties about the Sum of squared residuals and the linear regression function are restated. In particular three properties that an ideal fitted regression line must fulfill are discussed. Then, the R squared is defined using the measures of the Sum of squared residuals, the total sum of squares and the sum of explained squares. 2013 Level: mittel Econometrics // Lecture 3: OLS and Goodness-Of-Fit (R-Squared)   KeynesAcademy In diesem Podcast spricht Philippe Kersting mit Expert*innen über plurale Perspektiven auf den Wirtschaftsunterricht, um plurale Perspektiven im Wirtschaftsunterricht zu entwickeln. 2024 Level: leicht Plurale Perspektiven im Wirtschaftsunterricht Philippe Kersting Plurale Perspektiven im Wirtschaftsunterricht Neue Ansätze zur Lösung der Klimakrise sind von den dominanten Strömungen der VWL nicht zu erwarten. Stattdessen verbleiben diese in einer Modellwelt, in der katastrophale Klimafolgen zu berechenbaren Risiken werden und politische Realitäten und Machtinteressen ausgeblendet bleiben. In der Folge werden konkrete Fragen, etwa nach der Umgestaltung des Verkehrssystems und einem ökologischen und global gerechten Ernährungssystem, gar nicht erst gestellt. Die implizite Antwort bleibt: Der Markt wird es richten. 2020 Level: leicht Die Klimakrise als Krise der Wirtschaftswissenschaften Katharina Keil und Max Wilken Economists for Future Si le PIB n'était plus la mesure pertinente aujourd'hui ? Blanchet et Fleurbaey proposent une réflexion sur le dépassement de cet indicateur pour prendre en compte le bien-être courant des populations et la soutenabilité du développement. A lire ici ! 2021 Level: leicht De quoi le PIB est la mesure et comment le dépasser Didier Blanchet, Marc Fleurbaey La Vie des Idées John K. Galbraith tells the economic history of a couple of economies (mostly UK, US and to a lesser extent Germany) from the end of the first world war until the Bretton Woods conference. He also provides a biography of John M. Keynes and outlines some central ideas of Keynes such as the possibility of an underemployment equilibrium. Galbraith complements the historical remarks by the biographical experiences he made in economic management (and in engaging with Keynes) serving as deputy head of the Office for Price administration during the second world war. 1977 Level: leicht The Age of Uncertainty Episode 7 The Mandarin Revolution John Kenneth Galbraith BBC, CBC, KCET and OECA Dabei ging es um den Alfred-Nobel-Gedächtnispreis für Wirtschaftswissenschaften (2019) und wir konnten mal genau nachhaken, was es mit diesen „Randomised Controlled Trials“ in der Entwicklungsökonomik auf sich hat. 2019 Level: mittel In der Wirtschaft mit Svenja Flechtner ... und die (Plurale) Entwicklungsökonomik Julia Cremer, Felix Roll, Martin Middelanis Podcast Hamilton argues that economics lacks the political economy context in order to understand racism, and demonstrates how racism is embedded in the political economy of America. 2020 Level: leicht How America’s Economy Runs on Racism Lynn Parramore Institute for New Economic Thinking

Spenden

Um sich weiterhin für Pluralismus und Vielfalt in der Ökonomik einzusetzen, benötigt das Netzwerk Plurale Ökonomik e.V. Unterstützung von Leuten wie dir. Deshalb freuen wir uns sehr über eine einmalige oder dauerhafte Spende.

Spenden