Wir brauchen eine kritische Wirtschaftswissenschaft - mehr denn je! Mit Exploring Economics stärken wir alternative ökonomische Ansätze und setzen der Mainstream-VWL ein kritisches und plurales Verständnis von ökonomischer Bildung entgegen. Außerdem liefern wir Hintergrundanalysen zu akuellen ökonomischen Debatten, um einen kritischen Wirtschaftsdiskurs zu stärken.
Doch leider geht uns das Geld aus, um unsere Arbeit fortzusetzen.
Mit einem kleinen Beitrag kannst Du Exploring Economics unterstützen, online zu bleiben. Danke!
Wir sind ein eingetragener, gemeinnütziger Verein | Netzwerk Plurale Ökonomik e.V. | IBAN: DE91 4306 0967 6037 9737 00 | SWIFT-BIC: GENODEM1GLS | Impressum
Steven G. Medema is a Research Professor at Duke University. His research focuses on the History of Economic Thought, having published extensively on the issue of social costs of production (conceptualized as externalities in neoclassical economics). In this recorded seminar, he exposes his working paper on the history of the concept of externalities in economic literature, starting from Pigou’s “The Economics of Welfare” (1920), where Pigou makes the case for governmental intervention in the market where there is a divergence between private and social costs or benefits of a productive activity. The paper challenges the dominant view of a linear evolution of externality theory, by exposing how economists post Pigou rarely wrote about externalities and how, when they did, it was mostly in a very different context from Pigou’s welfare economics. It was only when economists started writing about environmental issues that a preoccupation with externalities, as uncompensated costs of production, began to emerge again, but even then there were different conceptions of externalities at stake. A link to the paper can be found on the podcast website.
The lecture, along with the supporting working paper, can be used as an introduction to the history of the concept of externalities in economic theory, from its roots in Pigouvian welfare economics to its widespread use in neoclassical economics, particularly in Environmental Economics.